Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hulsey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
In arguing the general grounds, the defendant raises two issues which will be discussed separately.(a) The first concerns accidental means within the policy provision quoted in the facts. The contention is that the insured’s death is the natural and proximate result of his assault on the wife with a deadly weapon.
In dealing with the terminology “accidental means” in insurance policies, the courts have generally approached assaults by an insured on the basis of whether the fate met by the insured was both foreseeable and the natural and probable consequence of the assault.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riggins v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Union Central Life Insurance v. CoferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Johnson v. Southern Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Carolina Life Insurance Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Butler v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Mattie B. Dutton, Mamie Ann SheleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Daniel v. Dixie Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Friedman v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.