Legal Opinion

Spratley v. Winchell Donut House, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1987No. D004042PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

The superior court sustained without leave to amend defendant Winchell Donut House, Inc.’s demurrer to plaintiff Andrea Spratley’s first amended complaint for fraud and bad faith. The court entered judgment dismissing the lawsuit. Spratley appeals. We affirm the judgment of dismissal.

I

Spratley’s first amended complaint’s purported cause of action for fraud alleged: Spratley told Winchell she did not wish to accept employment with Winchell because she feared working alone at night as a baker at Winchell’s shop where a burglary had recently occurred. To induce Spratley to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wallis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. O'HARA v. Western Seven Trees Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Renteria v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lenk v. Total-Western, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Branch v. Homefed BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Jones v. Los Angeles Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Lapinad v. Pacific Oldsmobile-GMC, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
  5. Gunnell v. Metrocolor Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API