Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee Land Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee

Decided March 6, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Upon the Intervening Petition of Ford, Eaton & Co.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, District Judge.

In this case the petitioners seek to recover the purchase price of some land which the petitioners claim to have sold to the East Tennessee Land Company by ex-ecutory contract prior to the commencement .of this suix, and for the enforcement of an alleged vendor’s lien upon the land so sold. The master to whom this and other matters were referred has reported against the petitioner, placing his decision upon the lack of a good title in the petitioners. As appears from the facts disclosed, there are several questions of doubt in regard to whether the petitioners are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Dushane v. BeallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Lehigh Val. Transp. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Coy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1912
  3. Pederson v. North Yakima & East Selah Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API