Gilchrist v. Stevenson
New York Supreme Court
The plaintiffs in their complaint demanded, as relief, that the defendant, William Stevenson, should account with them for all sums of money received and collected on two bonds and mortgages, since their assignment by Daniel Stevenson, and which the plaintiffs alledged were assigned by said Daniel Stevenson for their benefit; and that the defendant should be directed to collect all sums remaining unpaid on such bonds and mortgages, and to account and pay over to the…
Read the full summary
The plaintiffs in their complaint demanded, as relief, that the defendant, William Stevenson, should account with them for all sums of money received and collected on two bonds and mortgages, since their assignment by Daniel Stevenson, and which the plaintiffs alledged were assigned by said Daniel Stevenson for their benefit; and that the defendant should be directed to collect all sums remaining unpaid on such bonds and mortgages, and to account and pay over to the plaintiffs their proportions of the same. By an indorsement on the back of one of the mortgages which was given by E. Hills to…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Paige, P. J.
The assignment of the bonds and mortgages against E. Hills and H. and S. Waller, by Daniel Stevenson to John McDougall, the father of the plaintiffs Mrs. Gilchrist, Mrs. Hall, and Daniel and William McDougall, and the execution of the instrument in writing executed by John McDougall and his three adult children, and the delivery of the bonds and mortgages to the defendant, under an agreement that they should be so delivered, and that he should collect the moneys due thereon and pay over the same to the persons declared by such instrument to be interested therein,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kip v. Bank of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Cruger v. HallidayNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
3Cited by12 opinions
- Henderson v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- In the Matter of American Biomaterials Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, Debtor. In the Matter of Helitrex Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Debtor. In the Matter of Creative Care Systems, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Debtor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Brown v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Geary v. PageThe Superior Court of New York City · 1862
- Graham v. HoyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.