Legal Opinion

Williams v. Petromark Drilling, LLC

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 7, 2013No. 108,125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PlERRON, J.:

Petromark Drilling, LLC and Ace Fire Underwriters Insurance Company (Petromark) appeal from the Workers Compensation Board’s (Board) reversal of the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) denial of David C. Williams’ workers compensation claim. Petromark argues that Williams’ injuries are not compen-sable under either K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 44-508(f)’s going-and-coming rule or K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 44-501(d)(l)’s “willful failure to use a guard” rule. We agree on the issue of the going-and-coming rule and reverse tire Board’s finding.

Facts

At the time of his automobile accident, Williams was 23…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Douglas v. Ad Astra Information Systems, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Scott v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Messenger v. Sage Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. LaRue v. Sierra Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Petromark Drilling, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API