Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Ostrove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 21, 1984, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

In December of 1980, claimant commenced employment as a provisional caseworker, i.e., a social worker, with the Commission of Juvenile Justice, an agency of the City of New York. The appointment was made permanent on June 4,1983 and she was assigned to the Manhattan Family Court. Five days later, with notice to her employer, claimant moved from the city to her parents’ home in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KudyschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Matter of AronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re the Claim of RuggiloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. In re the Claim of JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re the Claim of FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re the Claim of MannettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of RegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API