Legal Opinion

American Cable Ry. Co. v. Mayor of New York

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 7, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the American Cable Railway Company against the mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of New York and the city of Brooklyn for infringement of a patent. On final hearing. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an action of infringement of letters patent, Fío. 271,727, granted to Daniel J. Miller, February 6, 1883, for improvements in the construction of cable railways. The patent is now owned by the complainant. The portion of the invention involved in the present suit relates to a combined cable support and cable lifter so arranged that horizontal sections of the cable can be raised sufficiently to be received into the gripper at any desired point. The pulleys which carry the cable are also used' as lifters, two of them being mounted on hinged frames and connected by a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Magowan v. New York Belting & Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballard v. McCluskeyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  2. American Cable Ry. Co. v. Mayor of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  3. Mayor of New York v. American Cable Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API