Goldwyn Pictures Corp. v. Howells Sales Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
It is always somewhat difficult to know just what changes in a pleading or in parties create a new “cause of action.” Courts differ very materially, but in such matters, even at law (and this is in equity), we follow our own interpreta*459tion of Rev. St. § 954 (Comp. St. § 1591). Salyer v. Consolidation Coal Co., 246 Fed. 794, 796, 159 C. C. A. 96. Therefore cases like Davis v. Mayor, etc., of City of New York, 14 N. Y. 506, 67 Am. Dec. 186, and Doyle v. Carney, 190 N. Y. 386, 83 N. E. 37, would not even be in point if this were an action at law. Shields v. Barrow,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Davis v. . the Mayor, C., of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Schmidinger v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Doyle v. . CarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- King v. Edward B. Marks Music CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- McGrath v. West End Orchard & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Southern Music Pub. Co. v. Walt Disney ProductionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947