Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1942No. Appeal, 166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The appeal, which was submitted without oral argument, is from the refusal to take off a non-suit entered on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. At about 8.50 P. M., October 20,1937, plaintiff, accompanied by his wife and stepson, was in his car which was parked at the curb of Franklin Street, in Wilkinsburg. He started his car toward the middle of the street (it being necessary to pass a car parked in front of Ms) but before reaching the street car track, his car stalled. It was then near the rail but not over it, and, apparently, on a diagonal line drawn from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mead v. Central Pennsylvania Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Estep v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. McPherson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Pollock v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Coleman v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hinton v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API