Legal Opinion

Hentig v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1910No. Civ. No. 667PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon motion against sureties on an undertaking to perfect an appeal from a money judgment and to stay execution thereon. (8 Cal. App. 221, [96 Pac. 390].)

The motion was regularly noticed and heard upon a showing by the respondent that more than thirty days had elapsed since the filing in the office of the clerk of the superior court of the remittitur of this court affirming the judgment of the trial court; that $50 additional costs had been incurred by respondent, and that no part of the judgment appealed from had been paid. It was also made to appear to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heisen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hentig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Chilstrom v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleverdon v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API