Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Signer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1972No. D. D. No. 72-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have examined the record of the testimony taken at the hearing before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, with the exhibits presented by both relator and respondent, together with a careful analysis of such evidence as to each count passed upon by the board, and we agree that the record amply supports the findings of the board that respondent, Burton R. Signer, is guilty as charged in counts 3, 5, 6 and 7, and thereby is guilty of misconduct as defined in Section (5) (a) of Rule XVIII of the Rules of Practice of this court, all in violation of Canons 6,11, 29 and 32 of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. SignerKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. SignerKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API