Legal Opinion

Pioneer-Hydrotex Industries, Inc. v. Barfield

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1963No. 42808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.

Appellant,. Pioneer-Hydrotex Industries, Inc., filed its declaration in the Circuit Court of Quitman County, Mississippi, in which.it alleged that the appellee, Jim Barfield, owed it $607.10 for goods, wares and merchandise purchased by him. Appellant attached to its declaration an alleged account, duly sworn to by its claims-manager. After defendant, Jim Barfield, was summoned, he filed his answer and denied having purchased wares, goods and merchandise from plaintiff. Defendant did not attach to his plea a counter affidavit, nor did he deny the correctness of the itemized account which was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Finck v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sanders & Alexander, Inc. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pipes v. NortonMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Reinhardt v. CarterMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Griffith v. GoodinMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stanton & Associates v. Bryant Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Motive Parts Warehouse v. D & H AUTO PARTSMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Munshower v. KolbenheyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Ricks Lumber Co., Inc. v. Natchez Steel and Pipe, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Deaton, Inc. v. BlakeneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API