Paulos v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The original opinion affirmed this case on the ground that no duplicate statement of facts was filed in the trial court and that no question was raised for our consideration. Upon a more careful consideration of appellant’s brief and argument we have decided that, under the facts here, we should consider the statement of facts and the contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction.

Appellant was charged with theft by complaint and information which alleged two former convictions for like offenses. The proof was…