Chambers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
McCurn, P. J. (dissenting).
In my view of it the attempted forfeiture was premature and therefore ineffective. The policy provides: ‘ ‘ Failure to repay a policy loan or premium loan, or to pay interest thereon, shall not avoid the policy unless the *109total indebtedness thereon including accrued interest shall equal or exceed the loan value at the time of such failure, nor until thirty-one days after notice has been mailed ” (emphasis supplied). The loan certificate provides: “ Second. That said loan shall bear interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum payable semi-annually on the first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roeser v. National Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- New York Life Insurance Company v. ShivleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Walsh v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Senin, Admr. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943