Legal Opinion

People v. Ring

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions, City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting defendant of delivery of a deficient quantity of a commodity and a violation of section 188 of the Agriculture and Markets Law, unanimously affirmed. The evidence established a delivery following the misrepresentation as to the weight of the commodity. Section 188 of the Agriculture and Markets Law does not require that the potential customer be in fact actually defrauded. In this respect it differs from section 2411 of the Penal Law. The principle of Peoplev. Visconti (234 N. Y. 165) is controlling,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. People v. . ViscontiNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Masback Hardware Co.New Rochelle City Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API