Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1934No. 9830PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Unless a “judgment for a sum certain” has been rendered in the trial court, the Supreme Court has no authority under the Civil Code, § 6213, to award damages in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, although it might be the opinion of the court that “the cause was taken up for delay only.” It appearing from a statement of counsel for the plaintiff in error and a response thereto by counsel for the defendant in error that the present case has become moot, and the judgment complained of not being for a sum certain, but being a judgment refusing an interlocutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Furr v. Bank of FairmountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  2. Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Berryman v. Royston BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. SlatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API