Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Lansdale Borough

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COVEY.

I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s decision affirming the trial court’s modification of the Lansdale Borough Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) termination of George Johnson’s (Johnson) employment. The Majority’s ruling is based upon its recognition that the scope of the trial court’s review of a borough civil service commission’s determination is “as [the trial court] deems proper,” which “gives a trial court broad authority to revisit the discipline imposed by a township civil service commission.” Majority Op. at 815 (emphasis added). I agree…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Day v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Baker CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Lewis v. PHILADELPHIA CIV. SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Eppolito v. BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API