Johnson v. Lansdale Borough
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge COVEY.
I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s decision affirming the trial court’s modification of the Lansdale Borough Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) termination of George Johnson’s (Johnson) employment. The Majority’s ruling is based upon its recognition that the scope of the trial court’s review of a borough civil service commission’s determination is “as [the trial court] deems proper,” which “gives a trial court broad authority to revisit the discipline imposed by a township civil service commission.” Majority Op. at 815 (emphasis added). I agree…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Day v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Baker CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lewis v. PHILADELPHIA CIV. SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Eppolito v. BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.