Robertson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of pursuing the business of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.
The court did not err in refusing to quash the indictment. Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226, 128 S. W. Rep., 125; Slack v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 372, 136 S. W. Rep., 1074.
Appellant requested the court to instruct the jury peremptorily to acquit appellant. We do not think the court erred in refusing to give such instruction, and will discuss this question more…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Fox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Trinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Marmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Privitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Goss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918