Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Saadatmand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*416We decline to disturb the pendente lite award. There is no showing of either exigent circumstances or a failure by Supreme Court to consider the appropriate factors, such as the parties’ respective incomes and their preseparation standard of living (see Mimran v Mimran, 83 AD3d 550, 550 [2011]; Ayoub v Ayoub, 63 AD3d 493, 497 [2009], appeal dismissed 14 NY3d 921 [2010]). The record does not support defendant’s contention that plaintiffs property assets constituted part of her compensation during the marriage (compare Isaacs v Isaacs, 246 AD2d 428, 428-429 [1998]).

Supreme Court providently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Mimran v. MimranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Granato v. GranatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karg v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Murray v. RashidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Donnelly v. Gur-ArieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API