Strauss v. Saadatmand
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*416We decline to disturb the pendente lite award. There is no showing of either exigent circumstances or a failure by Supreme Court to consider the appropriate factors, such as the parties’ respective incomes and their preseparation standard of living (see Mimran v Mimran, 83 AD3d 550, 550 [2011]; Ayoub v Ayoub, 63 AD3d 493, 497 [2009], appeal dismissed 14 NY3d 921 [2010]). The record does not support defendant’s contention that plaintiffs property assets constituted part of her compensation during the marriage (compare Isaacs v Isaacs, 246 AD2d 428, 428-429 [1998]).
Supreme Court providently…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Isaacs v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Mimran v. MimranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Granato v. GranatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karg v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Murray v. RashidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Donnelly v. Gur-ArieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012