Cleo F. Byrd v. Howard M. Comstock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner, a California state prisoner, appeals from an order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner and a co-defendant, who were represented by the same attorney, were convicted of robbery after joint trial before a judge sitting without a jury.
Petitioner’s claims arise from use at trial, without objection, of a statement given to the police by petitioner’s co-defendant.
Petitioner complains that the record does not establish that his co-defendant was given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) before her statement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. Bobby Taylor, Alias Robert HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judsonlee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Harry William PruittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- People v. FelixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lee v. HendersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.