Legal Opinion

Cleo F. Byrd v. Howard M. Comstock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1970No. 24694PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a California state prisoner, appeals from an order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner and a co-defendant, who were represented by the same attorney, were convicted of robbery after joint trial before a judge sitting without a jury.

Petitioner’s claims arise from use at trial, without objection, of a statement given to the police by petitioner’s co-defendant.

Petitioner complains that the record does not establish that his co-defendant was given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) before her statement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. VarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. United States v. Bobby Taylor, Alias Robert HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judsonlee DraneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Harry William PruittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. People v. FelixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Lee v. HendersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API