Legal Opinion

Canty v. Sims

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1926No. 4 Div. 113Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

The appellee has filed his application for a rehearing, strenuously insisting that the opinion of this court pronounced on the 2d day of February, 1926, is erroneous. This court did not say in its opinion “that an,attachment issued upon affidavit which does not set out grounds therefor is void.” This court did say that the affidavit appearing in the record in this ease did not set out a single ground of attachment. And this court further said that the writ of attachment that did issue in this case was not authorized by law, and was void. This court is not unmindful of the liberal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Roach v. PrivettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Bowen v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Burgin v. Ivy Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API