Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 25, 1991No. ACMR 9000332PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*589OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Judge:

Appellant, a drill sergeant, was tried by a special court-martial composed of officers and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of violating a regulation by having sex with a trainee, obstruction of justice, and adultery. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence.

The sole issue before this court is whether the military judge erred by denying a defense motion for a finding of not guilty to the adultery specification where it failed to allege that appellant was a married man.1 We find…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. BrecheenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. BernerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. BrewsterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. RobbaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API