United States v. King
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*589OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
Appellant, a drill sergeant, was tried by a special court-martial composed of officers and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of violating a regulation by having sex with a trainee, obstruction of justice, and adultery. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence.
The sole issue before this court is whether the military judge erred by denying a defense motion for a finding of not guilty to the adultery specification where it failed to allege that appellant was a married man.1 We find…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. BrecheenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BernerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. BrewsterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. RobbaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991