Legal Opinion

Howard v. Cobb

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1854PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by Howard, assignee, &c., against

Cobb, before a justice of the peace. The cause of action *6was a promissory note, given for a shingle-machine, and the defence specially pleaded was that the note was obtained by fraud, in this, that false representations were made as to utility, value, &c. On the trial of the appeal in the Circuit Court, there was judgment for the defendant.

J. Davis, for the plaintiff. J. S. Scobey, for the defendant.

The plaintiff brings the case to this Court, and assigns errors as follows:

“ 1. The Court erred in refusing to give to the jury the instructions asked for by…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Oklahoma v. McMasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Crolot v. MaloyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Salt Springs National Bank v. SchlosserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Howard v. KislingIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Davis v. FillmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API