Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Saunders

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1942No. 9316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the income tax of respondent for 1926. The question presented is whether the respondent, having elected to report, on the installment basis, income that was received in 1925 from a sale of real estate in that year, was required by Section 212(d) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 162, to report the second payment from the sale on the same basis in 1926.

In 1925 the taxpayer agreed to sell certain land for $400,000, of which $1,000 was to be paid in cash, $9,000 was to be paid within fifteen days from the time of delivery of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pacific National Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rose v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  4. Buttolph v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  5. Marks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Industrial Alcohol Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
  3. Youngblood v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974
  4. McCord v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. West v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API