Legal Opinion

Hocking v. City of Dodgeville

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 4, 2009No. 2008AP2812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The issue on this appeal is whether the ten-year statute of repose for actions for injury resulting from improvements to real property, Wis. Stat. § 893.89 (2007-08), 1 bars this action against the City of Dodgeville. Glen and Louann Hocking claim damages to their property resulting from excessive storm water run-off, which, they allege, constitutes a nuisance and is the result of negligence by the City in the design, plotting, approval, and development of an adjacent subdivision. The Hockings contend the circuit court erred in rejecting their argument that the circumstances here fall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SampleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gonzalez v. TeskeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Kohn v. Darlington Community SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hocking v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API