Legal Opinion

Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. House

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1942No. 6 Div. 981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The controlling question of law in this case is whether or not it is sufficient to make payment of weekly premium sums to an agent of defendant in an industrial policy when such agent has authority to make collections of that sort, without an entry of them on the premium receipt book belonging with the policy, under a clause in the policy which provides that “all premiums are payable at the home office of the company weekly in advance, but may be paid to an authorized representative of the company, provided that such payment must be entered at the time in the premium receipt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dominco v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. WoodsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. East v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. East v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mulkin v. McDONOUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF GA.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Finch v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API