Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Sutorius & Hanover Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter Fox Cohalan, J.

Cross motion by respondent, Hanover Insurance Company, for an order vacating the arbitration award rendered herein; or vacating the arbitration award in excess of the $10,000 minimum fina 'cial responsibility per person limits mandated by the State of New York is granted.

Claimant, Walter Sutorius, has petitioned for an order pursuant to CPLR 7510 confirming the award of an arbitrator and for judgment under CPLR 7514.

The proceeding arises from a claim for underinsurance benefits due to severe injuries sustained by claimant in a motor vehicle accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Reichel v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Local 205, Community and Social Agency Employees'union v. Day Care Council of Ny Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API