Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. CA, INC.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided August 23, 2006No. C.A. 699-NPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAMB, Vice Chancellor.
This motion to compel arises because the stockholder of a troubled corporation sought to exercise her rights under 8 Del. C. § 220 to investigate the books and records of the company. After having initially resisted the demand on the basis of a Special Litigation Committee’s concurrent investigation, the corporation then agreed to respond to the stockholder’s requests, subject to some restrictions. While the corporation has produced considerable documentation, the stockholder believes that she is due further documents under Section 220. In this opinion,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Security First Corp. v. U.S. Die Casting & Development Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- CM & M GROUP, INC. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Grimes v. DSC Communications Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1998
- Highland Select Equity Fund, L.P. v. Motient Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
3Cited by11 opinions
- Central Laborers Pension Fund v. News Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Melzer v. CNET Networks, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- In Re Crown Castle International Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Alexandria Venture Investments, LLC v. Verseau Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- Deborah Pettry and Gail Friedt v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.