Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rutherford v. Buhler

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1976No. 2390Published

1DissentLopez, Judge

I dissent.

Judge Sutin’s opinion concludes that a case filed before a statute was amended is nonetheless controlled by that statute. In the recent case of Estate of William L. Childers, Sr. v. Childers, N.M., 552 P.2d 465, 1976 the Supreme Court decided that another provision of the amended probate laws (Laws 1975, Ch. 120, § 3) prohibiting challenges based on the district court not having jurisdiction, could not apply to a case which was filed before that amendment became effective. Similarly, in the case before us the court is attempting to apply a jurisdictional provision of a statute to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barela v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Marquez v. WylieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stockard v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  4. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque v. DunbarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Brown v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API