Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Wear

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1922No. 23,398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Thomas district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

Virgil W. Johnston and the Illinois Trust and Savings Bank sued F. E. Wear, F. W. Casner, and the Irrigation Loan and Trust Company to recover certain real property. The plaintiffs recovered judgment against F. E. Wear. F. W. Casner and the Irrigation Loan and Trust Company in open court disclaimed all interest in the real property and their demurrer to the evidence of the plaintiffs was sustained. All the defendants appeal, but F. 'E. Wear seems to be the only defendant now claiming the property.

So far as this action is concerned, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tennent v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Auld v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Case v. Cherokee Lanyon Spelter Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. Mitchell v. InsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Schlender v. MaretoliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Levi v. LeviSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. First State Bank of Taos v. WheatcroftNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Fairchilds v. Ninnescah Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API