Commonwealth v. Chism
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
The issue on appeal is whether a Superior Court judge committed an error of law or abused his discretion in denying a defendant’s motion to impound a video recording and transcript of a police interview with the defendant that was the subject of a motion to suppress and that was subsequently suppressed. We conclude that the judge applied the correct legal standard in deciding that motion. We also conclude that, where the judge considered both the presumption of public access to judicial records and the defendant’s right to a trial decided by a fair and impartial jury, and where he…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brangan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Vasquez v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- QUINTEASHA DOSSANTOS v. BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS HOSPITAL-MILTON, INC., & OthersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024
- TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY & Others v. CLERK-MAGISTRATE OF THE CAMBRIDGE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT & othersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024