Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bienstock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1996No. 00172PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

The issues before us on appeal are: 1) whether an agent of the Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement had authority to stop a motorist when he observed the motorist driving his car erratically, and 2) if the stop was made without authority, whether the court erred in suppressing the evidence. We conclude the agent of the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement did not have authority to stop the motorist and suppression of the evidence was proper. The Commonwealth appeals. 1

In reviewing an appeal taken by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing evidence, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. United States v. Jerry Wayne SearpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. CorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrandtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. KinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DemorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. BradleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Com. v. Butts, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API