Commonwealth v. Bienstock
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge.
The issues before us on appeal are: 1) whether an agent of the Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement had authority to stop a motorist when he observed the motorist driving his car erratically, and 2) if the stop was made without authority, whether the court erred in suppressing the evidence. We conclude the agent of the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement did not have authority to stop the motorist and suppression of the evidence was proper. The Commonwealth appeals. 1
In reviewing an appeal taken by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing evidence, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- United States v. Jerry Wayne SearpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Commonwealth v. CorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrandtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. KinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. DemorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BradleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Com. v. Butts, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.