Legal Opinion
buySAFE, Inc. v. Google Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 29, 2013No. C.A. No. 11-1282-LPSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEONARD P. STARK, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion for judgment on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). (D.I. 31) Defendant argues that Plaintiff buySAFE, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) U.S. Pat. No. 7,644,019 (“the ’019 patent”) is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because it is directed to non-patent-eligible subject matter.
The parties completed briefing for this motion on August 31, 2012. (D.I. 32, 40, 42) The Court heard oral argument on October 26, 2012.1 (D.I. 49) (hereinafter “Tr.”) On May 17, 2013, the Court ordered the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Maio v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- buySafe, Inc. v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Buysafe, Inc. v. Google, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014