Legal Opinion

American Asiatic Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1922No. 3853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

These appeals are from decrees of the District Court in the cases of the American Asiatic Steamship Company against the Robert Dollar Company to recover damages for a breach of a charter party for the steamer Kaijo Maru and by the Robert Dollar Company against the steamship company to recover unpaid charter hire for such vessel.

On June 13, 1917, the Robert Dollar Company (hereafter referred to as the “owner”) entered into a time charter at San Francisco with the American Asiatic Company (hereafter designated as the “charterer”), whereby the former let to the latter and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Work v. LeathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. The HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Gracie v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  4. Clyde Commercial Steamships, Ltd. v. United States Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
  5. The FreyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Dennis v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Robert Dollar Co. v. American Asiatic Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API