Legal Opinion
Carroll Anesthesia Associates, P.C. v. Anesthecare, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 21, 1998No. A97A2346PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Plaintiff Carroll Anesthesia Associates, PC. (“Carroll”) sued Anesthecare, Inc. and others for tortious interference with contractual and business relations. Defendants moved for summary judgment and simultaneously filed a separate written request for oral argument on the motion. Carroll responded to the motion but did not request oral argument. Shortly thereafter, the court granted summary judgment to defendants.
1. Carroll contends the trial court erred by granting summary judgment without first holding oral argument as required by Uniform Superior Court Rule 6.3.
“[USCR] 6.3…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelley v. FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Department of Transportation v. APAC-Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Dixon v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Vincent v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Pit Stop, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mitchell v. Georgia Department of Community HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Carroll Anesthesia Associates, P.C. v. Anesthecare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Landsberg v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Holladay v. Cumming Family Med., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Bennett v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.