Legal Opinion
Veale v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 29, 1984No. 13-84-365-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The transcript in the above cause was received on the 13th of November, 1984. The transcript was determined to be late, and no motion for extension of time to file the transcript was timely filed. TEX.R. CIV.P. 21c.
The Court, having found that the transcript was not timely filed, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. TEX. R.CIV.P. 386. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Charles L. Meyer v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993
- Cheryl Goul (Harvey) v. Dan Harvey, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993
- Douglas Jabot v. Ed Sarnosky, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993
- Grace Woodruff and Ben Woodruff v. James Egger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991
- Harley Dawson v. Berl Handcox, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.