Carden v. Vanderslice
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The trial court ordered a 60-acre tract, owned jointly by 18 individuals as tenants in common, sold for division on the ground that the land could not be equitably divided in kind. We affirm.
The plaintiffs had the burden to prove that a fair and equitable partition of the land could not be made. We find that they sustained their burden by proof, especially in view of the presumption in favor of the trial court’s findings since he saw and heard the witnesses. Meador v. Meador, 255 Ala. 688, 53 So.2d 546 (1951).
The record shows that attempts at division were made before the suit…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Meador v. MeadorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- English v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ragland v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Barrow v. MyhandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Steadman v. Uptown Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Estate of Alfonso Francisco EscamillaSuperior Court of Guam · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.