Legal Opinion

State v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 2001No. 97C-20674; CA A102959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals from his convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 810.010, and third-degree assault, ORS 163.165. We write only to discuss defendant’s assignment of error that the court erred in admitting evidence that he previously had been convicted for driving under the influence of intoxicants and that, at the time of the incident leading to these charges, he was driving without a driver’s license or insurance. Defendant argues that this evidence constitutes impermissible bad acts evidence and should have been excluded under OEC 404(3). 1 For the reasons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JohnstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WyantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. CavanerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API