Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anello v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 18, 1975No. Nos. 6, 7, 18, Dockets 73-2156, 74-1445, 73-2274Published

1DissentMoore, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed with respect to the liability of all the defendants. I also agree that the award of $6,500 to Phyllis Anello for loss of consortium, while unquestionably high, is not so grossly excessive as to be set aside on appeal. However, I would order a new trial limited to the issue of John Anello’s damages.

The injury sustained by Anello was undoubtedly very painful, and the evidence showed that continued soreness in the foot somewhat impairs his ability to get around and do the things he once enjoyed. Even so, an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail RoadSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. John Mileski, an Infant Over the Age of 14 Years, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Edward Francis Mileski v. The Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. John Alexander and Annie Alexander v. Nash-Kelvinator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API