Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Bruce

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1892No. 14433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Fitzgerald, C.

On April 12, 1889, defendant A. L. Bruce mortgaged the premises described in the complaint, and valued at two thousand dollars, to secure the payment of a certain promissory note executed by him to plaintiff for the sum of five hundred dollars. On April 28, 1890, said mortgage was duly recorded. On April 7, 1890, defendant I. A. Bruce, wife of said A. L. Bruce, who, with her husband and children, were then, and for two years prior thereto had been, actually residing on and using said premises (which was common property) 'as a home, declared a homestead thereon, without any…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Duncan v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API