Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Kruegel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1996No. C9-95-1751Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.

Appellant Jeanette Rruegel challenges the district court’s order (1) ruling she is time-barred from electing to take an elective share in the estate of Arnold Kruegel (decedent), (2) allowing the estate to sell woodlots near her homestead, (3) denying her motion to increase monthly maintenance during the administration of the estate, and (4) denying her motion to remove farm machinery and equipment from the inventory of the estate. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Decedent, who was married to appellant for 29 years, died on April 21, 1994. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re Will of FieldsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of Estate of HoppkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. In Re the Estate of CassiusCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Crowell v. SallenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API