Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1890No. 12889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

PatrickHartigan died June 13, 1886, from injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of the defendant. He left a widow, the plaintiff in this action, but no children; also a will, of which he named John McCarthy as executor. The will being duly proved and admitted to probate, and letters testamentary issued to McCarthy, he brought an action .against the present defendant for damages for the injuries resulting in the death of his testator. Afterwards, and before the answer was filed to the complaint in that action, the plaintiff herein brought this suit against the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kramer v. San Francisco Market Street RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Moulton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helling v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Wilson-Harris, Adm'x v. Southwest Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Parmley v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Batchoff v. Butte Pacific Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Almquist v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API