Thompson v. Elliott

— The appellants, Sarah E. Thompson and William, Thompson, her husband, filed a complaint against Elliott, to which the court sustained a demurrer, because it *56did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and rendered a final judgment against the appellants for costs, to which they excepted. The correctness of the ruling of the court on the demurrer is the only question in the case.

The allegations of the complaint are, in substance, as follows: That on the 16th day of September, 1864, said Sarah E. Thompson purchased of Elliott a lot in the town of Crawfordsville, (which is…