Legal Opinion · Dissent

Richard v. Slate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1964Published

1DissentRossman, J.

With the greatest respect for the majority, I cannot bring myself to concur in their opinion. I do not believe that their opinion makes a just disposition of *176this case. Not a single decision which the prevailing opinion cites supports its holding which is that unless a complaint 'that alleges facts showing that the plaintiff has a cause of action against the def endant is filed by an administrator who, at the time of the filing, was a regularly appointed administrator, the situation is a nullity; and the complaint cannot be amended by an administrator who was later regularly appointed but not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Douglas v. Daniels Bros. Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API