Legal Opinion
MEDINA-JIMENEZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2018No. ID 3932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 399
(BIA 2018) Interim Decision #3932 Matter of Julio MEDINA-JIMENEZ, Respondent Decided August 7, 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The categorical approach does not govern whether violating a protection order under 237(a)(2)(E)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii) (2012), renders an alien ineligible for cancellation of removal under section 240A(b)(1)(C) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C) (2012); instead, Immigration Judges need only decide whether the alien has been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mellouli v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Sabino Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alvarez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Fernando Diaz-Quirazco v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Garcia v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Jose Barrios Leon v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Miguel Velasco-Marin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020