Legal Opinion
United States v. Sahabir
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 26, 2012No. 1:09-CR-507PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioners Baldeo Sahabir (“Baldeo”) and Kamla Sahabir (“Kamla”) (collectively “petitioners”), move pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct the imposed sentences. They also move for discovery, an evidentiary hearing, and appointment of counsel. The United States of America (“the Government”) opposes. Petitioners reply with permission. The motions were considered without oral argument.
*379 II. BACKGROUND
On September 23, 2009, the Government filed an indictment charging the petitioners with conspiracy to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Aparicio v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Eric C. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hough v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. ValasquezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014