Legal Opinion

Lampe v. Tyrell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1939No. 27462. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was brought by Mary Lampe, by her guardian ad litem, Annie Lampe; Anton Lampe and Annie Lampe, husband and wife; Elsie Hauge, by her guardian ad litem, Jennie Hauge; Andy Hauge and Jennie Hauge, husband and wife; Mildred Walentiny, by her guardian ad litem, Theresa Walentiny; Mathias Walentiny and Theresa Walentiny, husband and wife; against A. J. Tyrell and Joe Tyrell, to recover for injuries claimed to have been sustained by Mary Lampe, Elsie Hauge, and Mildred Walentiny, as the result of a collision between a car in which they were riding and a parked car, the car in which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosenstrom v. North Bend Stage LineWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. O'Brien v. WoldsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Eubanks v. KielsmeierWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Jensen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hurley v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Stock v. FifeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. West v. SotoArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Paulson v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Manos v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API