Allgood v. Parker
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
Sections 375 and 376, Acts 1919, p. 445, are not materially different from, and are practically the same as Code 1907, § 2411, as amended by Act of the Legislature, Sp. Sess. 1909, pp. 165, 166, and section 2412, and considered in the case of Lovelady v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb, 68 So. 48, 191 Ala. 96. The judge of probate, upon petition regularly filed, having issued his certificate in accordance with section 876 of the Act of 1919, p. 445, and' this court being bound by the decision in the Lovelady Case, supra, we must hold that the trial court did not commit error in granting the writ as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Revenue v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Lovelady v. Loveman, Joseph & LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Turner v. Anniston Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casmus v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Jones v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Blan v. Hollywood Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Allgood v. Hollywood Realty Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1926