Legal Opinion

Tonkel v. Moore

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1931No. 29454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellees, real estate brokers, sued appellant for the compensation claimed by them, as a result of a real estate sale, which, as the evidence shows, was consummated, not by the brokers, but by appellant direct with the purchaser. There are two counts in the declaration. The first coufit declared that appellees were employed to sell the property a3id that they did sell the same, whereby they earned the agreed compensation for the said sale services of two dollars and fifty cents per acre, amounting to two thousand fifteen dollars. The secofid count is upon the quantum meruit, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Wiggins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ragan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cannon v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Pitts v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Moore v. BurdineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API