Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 17, 1987No. 68500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant sought reinstatement of his driver’s license. Following trial a memorandum on a form provided by the court to counsel was signed by the attorneys for the parties, reading as follows:

Cause called. Petitioner appears by attorney. Respondent appears by attorney. Cause heard. Court because of prejudicial filing of information contained within court file sustains Petitioner’s Petition. Deft. Department of revenue ordered to reinstate petitioners License and to remove from said records any suspension of Driving privileges based on the alleged arrest of 2/2/85.

The memorandum was filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Byrd v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Taylor v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. JCA Architects, Inc. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. In the Interest of D.E.G. v. Juvenile Officer of Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2020
  3. Paulson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API